To Neutralize Our Enemies

What the Neville Roy Singham Network Reveals — and Why the Old Rules No Longer Apply

To Neutralize Our Enemies

What the Neville Roy Singham Network Reveals — and Why the Old Rules No Longer Apply

By Jim Reynolds | www.reynolds.com

Donald Trump has made one thing unmistakably clear since returning to the White House:

The era of symbolic concern is over.

The United States is no longer pretending that people actively working to fracture the country from within are merely “voices,” “activists,” or “misguided critics.” If you are deliberately undermining public order, delegitimizing lawful authority, or acting as a node in a hostile political‑warfare network, you are no longer owed indulgence.

That reality now hangs over figures like Neville Roy Singham — a U.S.-born, CCP‑aligned Marxist billionaire who has spent years building a sophisticated political‑warfare apparatus aimed at destabilizing the United States by exploiting American laws, institutions, and language against themselves.

This is not rhetoric.
It is not theory.
And Minneapolis just showed us how it works.

WHO SINGHAM IS — AND WHY HE MATTERS

Neville Roy Singham is not a protester, a commentator, or a philanthropist with eccentric politics.

He is a financier of political warfare.

Singham lives in China, openly admires regimes hostile to the United States, and describes America as “the belly of the beast.” He funds organizations whose explicit goal is not reform, but rupture — and whose messaging consistently aligns with Beijing’s strategic narratives.

What his money builds is not ambiguous:

• Movement media outlets that echo CCP lines while posing as “independent” or “grassroots”
• Legal-defense shells and nonprofit pass‑throughs that obscure funding origins
• Cadre‑based “people’s organizations” built for discipline, not debate
• Rapid‑response street‑mobilization networks capable of activating in hours
• Activist lawyers and narrative enforcers embedded in universities, unions, and NGOs

These groups do not hide their sympathies. They celebrate Beijing, Caracas, and Havana while branding the United States as uniquely illegitimate. They do not argue with American sovereignty — they deny it.

And they have learned to weaponize American vocabulary:
Justice. Solidarity. Human rights. Community defense.

This is not activism.

It is ideological camouflage.

WHAT MINNEAPOLIS REVEALED

The killing of Alex Pretti in Minneapolis exposed this machinery in real time.

Before investigations.
Before facts were established.
Before any neutral accounting of events.

A pre‑positioned response network activated immediately.

Within minutes:
• Encrypted channels lit up with guidance from trained organizers
• Volunteer spotters logged law‑enforcement movements
• ICE and CBP vehicles were reframed as “abductors”
• Professionally designed propaganda flooded social media
• Calls escalated almost instantly to a “general strike”

This was not grief.
It was rehearsed escalation.

You do not assemble that apparatus overnight. You build it, fund it, train it, test it — and then wait for an incident large enough to ride.

That funding ecosystem traces back, again and again, to Singham‑world.

THIS IS NOT GRASSROOTS

Real grassroots movements are messy.
They are slow.
They argue with themselves.

What we are seeing instead is engineered chaos.

• Rapid narrative lock‑in before evidence is collected
• Pre‑written slogans and graphics deployed on command
• Instant villain designation
• Immediate escalation from incident to regime indictment

The goal is not accountability.

The goal is paralysis.

Ports.
Roads.
Airports.
Enforcement.
Governance itself.

This is not protest culture.

It is political warfare.

THE ASYMMETRY PROBLEM

Here is the imbalance we have tolerated for far too long:

They get to use our institutions against us.

• Sanctuary policies that obstruct federal law enforcement
• Municipal governments that treat American agents as occupiers
• Universities and unions partnering with foreign‑aligned fronts
• Tax‑exempt nonprofits acting as logistical and narrative hubs
• Media laundering propaganda as activism

Meanwhile, we do not get to use their institutions against them.

This is not openness.

It is unilateral vulnerability.

WHAT HAS CHANGED

The scandal is not that men like Singham exist.

The scandal is that we treated them as curiosities instead of adversaries.

That indulgence has ended.

Trump’s governing instinct has always been blunt but accurate:
If you are actively damaging the safety, cohesion, and prosperity of the American people, you are fair game — within the law.

No class of enemy is exempt.
Wealth does not confer immunity.
Ideology does not confer innocence.

WHAT NEUTRALIZATION ACTUALLY MEANS

Neutralization is not vengeance.

It is lawful self‑defense.

Financial neutralization:
• Forensic audits of linked nonprofits and media outlets
• Loss of tax‑exempt status where laws are abused
• Personal accountability for executives and boards
• Regulatory pressure on financial pipelines

Legal neutralization:
• Indictments where coordination or laundering is proven
• Enforcement of foreign‑agent laws
• Travel and financial restrictions
• Due process — applied seriously

Cultural and political neutralization:
• Mandatory transparency of foreign‑linked funding
• Public accountability for institutional partners
• Ending the fiction of “neutral community partners”

Silence is no longer an option.

THE NEW REALITY

For the first time in a long while, people who despise the American order must factor in a president who is not afraid of them.

Not afraid of names.
Not afraid of elite scolding.
Not afraid to use lawful power to defend citizens.

That changes the math.

THE ONLY QUESTION LEFT

They say they want to dismantle America.
They say it openly.
They say it proudly.

The only remaining question is whether we stop pretending this is a misunderstanding.

Neutralizing Neville Roy Singham and his network — exposed, isolated, broke, and facing real legal jeopardy — is not radical.

It is overdue.

And patriotic Americans should demand nothing less.